Marvel News

Spider-Man: Brand New Day First Reactions Call It Tom Holland's Most Emotional MCU Performance

The embargo lifted and the verdict is loud: Holland has “never been better”. But the same night produced some pointed dissent, and both halves matter.

Tom Holland's Peter Parker in close-up, face scraped and bruised, eyes wet
The word almost every first reaction reached for was “emotional” — and several critics said they cried.

The Spider-Man: Brand New Day first reactions landed after the Los Angeles premiere on 27 July, and the headline is not in dispute: critics who have seen it are calling this Tom Holland's best work as Peter Parker. Variety's round-up led with the line that Holland has “never been better” in a sequel that ditches “multiverse tedium” for a “grounded Spider-Man tale”. Within a day the review embargo lifted properly and the film opened at 93% on Rotten Tomatoes from 43 counted reviews.

That number ties No Way Home for the best-reviewed Spider-Man film of Holland's run, ahead of Homecoming's 92% and Far From Home's 91%. It will move as more reviews register — an opening-day percentage from 43 critics is a snapshot, not a final grade.

What is more interesting than the score is the shape of the reaction. The praise clusters around one word, and the criticism clusters around another. Both are worth reading before you buy a ticket, because they are describing the same film.

What the Spider-Man: Brand New Day first reactions actually said

The premiere-night posts are social reactions, not reviews — short, enthusiastic by nature, and written by people who have just walked out of a Marvel premiere. Treat them accordingly. But the consistency across them is the signal.

Mike Ryan of Uproxx went furthest, calling it “Tom Holland's best performance as Peter Parker and the best Spider-Man movie since Raimi's SPIDER-MAN 2” — a comparison that carries real weight in this fandom and is not made casually.

Drew Taylor at TheWrap described it as “so joyful and emotional, investigating/celebrating/deconstructing both the character and his power”. Brandon Lewis of GVN called the emotional beats “among the MCU's best” and the film “easily Tom Holland's most varied, confident MCU work”.

Writing is sharp. Performances are excellent. Even teared up. I am SHOCKED at how good this is. — Matt Nando Kelly

Brian Davids called it the “most emotional, most mature and most atmospheric installment in the franchise”. Wendy Lee Szany singled out “how deep the story goes into the consequences of Peter's choice” — the choice being the spell at the end of No Way Home that erased him from everyone's memory.

The reservations, which are not a footnote

The same premiere produced genuinely mixed notes, and rounding them off would be doing you a disservice. Several critics landed on the opposite side of the same film.

James Preston Poole at Discussing Film called it an “overstuffed script that puts MCU interconnectivity and cameos over its title character”. Kaitlyn Booth at Bleeding Cool said it “feels like a stepping stone rather than a cohesive standalone film”. Erik Anderson of AwardsWatch was blunter still, citing “super dodgy CGI and really uninspired fight sequences”.

Carlos Alonso Morales at IGN felt the “stakes feel fairly low”, and Matt Neglia of Next Best Picture noted the film “doesn't fully pick up until Sadie Sink's character announces herself”. The Holofiles described it as “overstuffed with far too many elements” with a “painfully flat climax”.

Read those two lists together and a pattern appears. The people who loved it are describing the Peter Parker material. The people who did not are describing the connective tissue — cameos, franchise plumbing, the third act. A 93% with that spread usually means a film with a very strong centre and a soft edge.

It is worth naming what a premiere reaction is worth. These are posted by critics who were flown in, seated in a room full of cast and crew, and are writing in public under their own names an hour after the credits. That environment reliably produces warmth. It does not reliably produce a considered verdict, which is why the full reviews filed a day later are the ones that moved the Metacritic average down to the low seventies.

A grounded, street-level Spider-Man — by design

The most repeated structural note is that Brand New Day steps away from multiversal scale. Variety's framing of “multiverse tedium” being ditched is the aggregated version; Sean Tajipour of Nerdtropolis put it more vividly, saying it “feels like a three-part episode of the '90s Spider-Man animated series”.

Why that framing tracks with the cast list

It is consistent with what was already known. Jon Bernthal's Punisher and Mark Ruffalo's Hulk are both confirmed cast, and both are described in reactions as cameo-scale rather than co-lead. Michael Mando returns as Mac Gargan, a thread left dangling since Homecoming. This is a New York film with New York problems.

The four-year gap

The film is set roughly four years after No Way Home, which gives Peter a stretch of lived-in anonymity rather than picking up the morning after. That gap is doing a lot of the emotional work the reactions keep pointing at, and it is why the ending of No Way Home is the one piece of homework worth doing before Friday.

Destin Daniel Cretton's direction is the other story

Cretton came to Marvel from Short Term 12 and Just Mercy — small, performance-led dramas — by way of Shang-Chi. The reactions suggest that background is finally the point rather than a curiosity.

Cris Parker credited him directly: the film is “packed with so much emotional depth” and “spectacular new visual flair”, and “Destin Daniel Cretton nailed all these elements”. Brandon Pope said Cretton “honors beloved Spiderman media… to create something soulful + thrilling”.

Set against Anderson's CGI complaint, the likely reading is a director who is excellent with actors in a room and less well served by the effects pipeline around him. That is a very familiar Marvel shape.

The numbers, and how much to trust them

FilmRotten TomatoesNote
Spider-Man: Brand New Day93%43 reviews at embargo lift — still moving
Spider-Man: No Way Home93%Final, from 400+ reviews
Spider-Man: Homecoming92%Final
Spider-Man: Far From Home91%Final

The caveat matters more than the ranking. A 93% from 43 reviews and a 93% from four hundred are not the same claim. Opening-day percentages on Marvel films have historically drifted a few points as wider outlets file, and the mixed reactions above are exactly the reviews that tend to arrive late.

Metacritic, which weights and averages rather than counting thumbs, opened around 70 — a materially cooler read, and the one that usually predicts where a film settles.

Why this matters for Marvel Studios right now

Marvel needed this. No Marvel title made 2025's global top ten. The Fantastic Four: First Steps was the studio's biggest release of the year at $519.1M worldwide against a $200M budget, and Thunderbolts* took $382.4M on a $180M budget with the best reviews of Phase 5 — critical goodwill that did not convert. The budget problem has been the studio's defining story for two years.

  • Brand New Day is tracking for a $180M-plus domestic opening, which would be the biggest of 2026
  • It arrives five months before Avengers: Doomsday on 18 December, and functions as the on-ramp
  • A well-liked, self-contained Spider-Man film is the cheapest possible way to rebuild trust before a $400M crossover

There is a strategic argument buried in the reactions. If the praise really is for the grounded, personal material and the criticism really is for the franchise connective tissue, that is Marvel being told something quite specific about what audiences want from Phase 6 — and being told it in the week it starts selling the biggest cameo-stuffed crossover it has ever attempted.

What is still unknown

Plenty. Premiere reactions are not plot summaries, and the people posting them are working around spoiler embargoes.

QuestionStatus
Is it Holland's best-reviewed Spider-Man film?Tied with No Way Home at 93%, from far fewer reviews
Who does Sadie Sink play?Still officially unannounced. Reactions confirm the role is significant, not who it is
Who is the “invisible” villain in the synopsis?Unidentified. No reaction has named them on the record
How large are the Punisher and Hulk roles?Described as cameo-scale by reactions. No official confirmation of screen time
Does it set up Doomsday?Implied by the cameo criticism. Not confirmed by anyone on the record

We have written separately about the Sadie Sink casting rumours and the invisible villain theories, and nothing in these reactions settles either. Both remain speculation until the film is out on 31 July.

One more thing worth flagging for anyone deciding whether to go opening weekend: the complaints are load-bearing in a way the praise is not. A film can survive being called overstuffed and still be a good night out. It is harder to survive a flat climax, and three separate critics used almost exactly that phrase about the third act.

The honest bottom line

Spider-Man: Brand New Day appears to be a very good Peter Parker film with some franchise baggage bolted to it. The performance praise is unusually consistent — when eight separate critics independently reach for “emotional” and several admit to crying, that is not marketing.

The dissent is equally consistent, and it is about structure rather than substance: too many elements, a soft climax, effects work that does not match the acting. If those are your dealbreakers, the 93% will not protect you from them.

Most emotional, most mature and most atmospheric installment in the franchise. — Brian Davids

It opens internationally from 29 July and in the United States on 31 July. We will have our own review, with a score and without a stake in the outcome, once we have seen it.

Frequently asked

What are the Spider-Man: Brand New Day first reactions?
Overwhelmingly positive about Tom Holland's performance, with critics repeatedly calling it his most emotional turn as Peter Parker. Uproxx's Mike Ryan called it the best Spider-Man film since Raimi's Spider-Man 2. A minority of critics found the script overstuffed with cameos and franchise setup.
What is the Rotten Tomatoes score for Spider-Man: Brand New Day?
It opened at 93% based on 43 counted reviews, tying No Way Home for the highest of Tom Holland's Spider-Man films. That figure will shift as more reviews register — an opening percentage from 43 critics is far less settled than a final one from several hundred.
Is Brand New Day Tom Holland's best Spider-Man movie?
By critical score it is currently tied with No Way Home rather than ahead of it. Several critics have said it contains his best individual performance, which is a different claim from it being the best film, and the early dissent is specifically about the script rather than about him.
When does Spider-Man: Brand New Day release?
31 July 2026 in the United States, with international rollout beginning 29 July. The Los Angeles premiere was held on 27 July, which is where these first reactions came from.
Is Spider-Man: Brand New Day connected to Avengers: Doomsday?
Nothing official has been confirmed about a direct connection. Several critics complained the film prioritises MCU interconnectivity and cameos, which suggests setup, but no one has stated on the record that it leads into Doomsday on 18 December 2026.
How big are the Punisher and Hulk roles in Brand New Day?
Jon Bernthal and Mark Ruffalo are both confirmed cast, and premiere reactions describe their appearances as cameo-scale rather than substantial supporting roles. Marvel has not confirmed screen time for either.

Characters in this story

Hulk (Robert Bruce Banner) — Marvel hero character art

Hulk

Robert Bruce Banner

Catching up on the MCU? See where this fits on our full timeline.

Read next